Why Data Quality Automation Is Now Essential for Private Markets Risk Management

March 18, 2026
Read Time: 7 minutes
Authors: Rochelle Glazman
Operations & Growth
Private Markets

The private credit bulls are still running as Neuberger Berman raised $7.3 billioni for the close of its fifth fund and now manages over $24 billion in total private debt. Alternative asset managers are looking to insurance and retail investors to boost their capital pools, and those investors are happy to oblige. The WSJ reported in November that some U.S. insurers are allocating more than half of the fixed-income assets they need to fund policies and annuities in hard-to-trade private debt.ii At the same time, some thought leaders like Jamie Dimon are sounding alarms about the systemic risk after the First Brands/Tricolor episode. Buy side firms across the board are trading in private market asset classes. They all have capital preservation on their minds and are zealously managing liquidity risk.

Against this backdrop, modernized data quality management is a prerequisite to pretty much everything private markets firms need to accomplish operationally. However, data quality automation has some critical risk management benefits, especially when dealing with a notoriously complex private markets ecosystem — and the data comes with it.

How automated data quality strengthens liquidity and operations

Automated data quality gives buy side firms a unified data foundation they can trust — catching mis-entered identifiers, mismatched valuations, and liquidity exposures early so portfolios aren’t built on bad assumptions and risk events are flagged before they escalate.

Eliminating security master errors before they spread

Automated data quality checks flag corruptions before they enter the security master, the all-important system for organizing both numerical and non-numerical securities data. Security master data errors can cause problems that cascade throughout the entire investment lifecycle. Errors in numerical data in the security master such as coupons and risk metrics lead directly to damaging errors like miscalculating payments and amortization. If the coupon rate in the security master is entered incorrectly through a fat finger mistake (e.g., inputting 1% instead of 10%), a firm is potentially leaving thousands of dollars on the table. Errors in sector classifications, identifiers, corporate actions, or other non-number data in the security master mean the portfolio manager has an errant view of risk and exposure. Managers might then proceed with business thinking they are overexposed to one sector and underexposed to another when it could be the reverse. Automated data quality controls reconcile conflicting data and enable continuous monitoring and corporate actions processing.

Arcesium Logo Mark
The Data Challenge Defining Private Markets Today

A crucial factor in the changing nature of private market investing revolves around data. Managers need to become more effective and efficient at managing, analysing, and reporting on the vast quantities of complex and unstructured data related to existing and prospective investments. Improvements in these areas could be a significant driver of alpha, but more pressingly, asset owners are demanding it. They need greater transparency on holdings, the investment process, costs and on sustainability criteria, placing tremendous strain on the existing reporting capabilities of many asset managers. — AIMAiii

Valuations errors lead to liquidity mismanagement

Each investment strategy, vehicle, and structure brings unique factors in valuations, investment lifecycle events, liquidity, and risk. In private debt strategies, the value of the assets used as collateral is a critical factor so firms need to ensure assets are accurately valued and whether their value is increasing, decreasing, or stable. The monthly or daily generation of accurate NAVs is reliant on precise borrowing base calculations to determine the amount of money the lender is willing to give a borrower and how much available credit a borrower has. For example, a private markets firm heavy into asset-based finance or other pooled loans that makes a mistake inputting a borrower code will be under the mistaken impression that they have allocated more or less to a certain sector.

Regular monitoring and airtight data quality are essential to maintaining the integrity of the collateral. Missed data quality issues can result in mispriced funds or portfolios, incorrect management fees, and distorted return calculations. GPs and LPs need platforms that can automate complex data-based workflows, harmonize intricate datasets from disparate sources, and power the production of real-time valuations. A firm’s data platform should automatically pull in data and validate it from several sources when dealing with multiple borrowers and data for the underlying collateral, saving enormous amounts of time.

Investor reporting demands transparency and precision

Aside from losing millions of dollars and potentially catastrophic liquidity planning, data quality errors can damage relationships with LPs and regulatory bodies. A 2025 CFA Institute survey revealed that the frequency and accuracy of valuation reporting is the #1 concern of investment managers when it comes to private markets, followed closely by the frequency, comparability, and accuracy of performance measures. Further, 37% called the frequency and accuracy of valuation reporting a substantial problem or total failures.iv

Private markets managers are striving to keep investors and internal stakeholders happy by serving up visually appealing reports with up-to-the-minute, reliable data for investor statements, daily NAVs, trial balances, and cash flow/activity reporting. Manual workflows are woefully insufficient to meet the reporting needs of in-house operations teams, investors, and regulatory bodies. To make this workable, firms can deploy platforms with automated, scheduled reporting operations with reusable templates and self-service functionality, as well as data lineage and integrity functions. The ability to track data history is vital for mitigating operational risk and regulatory risk.

Data lineage is the backbone of compliance and auditability

Using a single golden source of data, managers can free up significant resources currently tied up in gathering data from fragmented sources by implementing automated reports and transparent disclosures that auto-fill forms such as the SEC’s Form PF. The same centralized single source of data also makes possible robust data governance tools to gain pinpoint visibility over lineage. The holy grail for regulatory compliance is observability and auditability when it comes to all data records.

Data lineage gives risk and compliance teams an in-depth understanding of the history and flow of data within their systems for items like journal entries, investor cash flows, and complex assets. And they can trace how a dataset was transformed and amended from the moment it was ingested through the present day. Automated data lineage tools ensure that all data flows remain auditable and allow users to identify, diagnose, and fix data exceptions. Even better, the best data lineage tools store information in multiple timelines with bitemporal “as-of and as-is" modeling, thus preserving reliable historical information for precise audit trails. When regulators call, these firms will answer promptly and build an aura of trust and reliability among regulators and investors. 

Persistent, enterprise-wide data quality 

Private markets firms can improve their value proposition by installing modern automated data quality solutions. Moreover, data quality automation is indispensable when rolling AI tools out enterprise wide. However, a firm has not achieved data quality until its controls become persistent and transparent, and anomalies can be swiftly resolved before causing problems. 

Private market managers can go a long way in containing risks in their increasingly complex investment strategies with a data quality framework. Firms can tame the public-private asset convergence beast with buttoned-up data quality processes that prevent errors in all six dimensions: accuracy, completeness, uniqueness, validity, timeliness, and consistency. With transaction volumes and strategy sophistication growing beyond human capabilities, automation in data quality functions is mandatory.

Rochelle Glazman

Authored By

Rochelle Glazman

Rochelle is responsible for enabling go-to-market and growth strategies across sales, marketing, product, and client engagement. Before taking on this role, Rochelle was a Senior Pre-Sales Consultant, engaging with clients and prospects across the financial services industry. Prior to joining Arcesium, Rochelle spent over five years at BlackRock Aladdin servicing institutional asset managers and leading several implementation projects across North and South America. She graduated from Vanderbilt University with a degree in economics.

View Author Profile

Share This post

Subscribe Today

No spam. Just the latest releases and tips, interesting articles, and exclusive interviews in your inbox every week.