Summary
Headlines and disclosure form debates don’t define the private credit sector. The real nuance is transparency: Five core points explain how private markets run on information asymmetry, why Form PF isn’t all that key for investors, how investor transparency is negotiated, why stress will behave differently than in 2008, and where structure matters most as capital broadens.
Jeb Altonaga
Jeb recently joined Arcesium in a business development capacity focused on Private Markets, leveraging his extensive experience to deepen engagement within this fast-growing segment of the alternatives landscape.
In 2021, Jeb founded Clearglass Capital Partners, a private capital advisory firm supporting financial sponsors and institutional investors in capital formation and strategic initiatives. Previously, he served as COO of Sandon Capital in Sydney and Partner & COO of Blue Pool Capital, chairing the firm’s Valuation and Operating Committee where he also held fiduciary roles as Director of the Investment Manager and its Cayman funds. Earlier in his career, Jeb was with Citadel, later relocating to Hong Kong.
Jeb holds an MBA from NYU Stern and has served on the Board of Hedge Funds Care, Asia (HFC), where he chaired the Grants Committee supporting child protection initiatives across the region
Sources:
[i] Proskauer, October 2025. https://www.proskauer.com/report/proskauers-private-credit-default-index-reveals-rate-of-184-for-q3-2025
[ii] Alternative Credit Investor, November 2025. https://alternativecreditinvestor.com/2025/11/27/sec-targets-private-credit-amid-market-concerns/
[iii] CFTC, September 2025. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9126-25
[iv] JPMorgan, Guide to Alternatives, October 2025. https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/institutional/insights/market-insights/guide-to-alternatives/
